Will Wikileaks Guy Dance With the Stars?

Although it seems doubtful that Wikileaks impresario Julian Assange will go down in history as an okay guy, much less a hero, it would appear that he has ceased for the time being to be the object of a lynch mob.  When the first batch of leaks was published some months ago, it stirred up fears that America’s counterintelligence network would be irreparably damaged.  This time, however, the news media have been feasting on the leaks, even as their editorials have self-servingly played down the collateral damage the disclosures might cause. An irony is that the patchwork of international gossip divulged in recent days has provided insights into the world of diplomacy that make the news media’s coverage of the topic seem almost irrelevant.

For instance, we’ve been reading for years about how Saudi Arabia feared the growth of Iranian Shiite influence in the Arab world. But compare that story with the Wikileaks bombshell that Arab leaders have been actively trying to provoke the U.S. into launching an air strike against Iran. Will publicizing this fact unbalance the geopolitical world?  Arguably not, since the Iranians would have known how the Saudis feel about them without using Wikileaks as a source. On the other hand, the leak is bound to change public perceptions of the issues involved, possibly forcing the hand of the aggressor. Since either side could be the aggressor here, one could infer that the chances of an attack have increased.

A Hunted Man

Meanwhile, Assange is indeed a hunted man, but this time it is TV news producers who have been trying to track him down, not Interpol or a torch mob. We wouldn’t rule out the possibility that he’ll turn up in Dancing With the Stars in 2011, especially if the most salacious details of the latest Wikileaks continues to spill out via the tabloid press.  And when we say tabloid press, we don’t mean National Enquirer, Weekly World News and other rags that routinely report on alien abductions, two-headed babies and such. Rather, we are referring to Huffington Post, Daily Kos and every media outlet above them in the food chain, including the New York Times. While the Grey Lady is unlikely to headline Qaddafi’s penchant for Botox and bimbos, as Huffington already has, it is predictable the esteemed Newspaper of Record’s Style sections will not sit idly buy while The Daily Beast and other gossip-mongers continue to commandeer eyeballs on the web by the hundreds of millions.

(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)

  • walter fields December 6, 2010, 5:18 pm

    Your aesthetics ARE you ethics. Your awful Assange
    dancing with the stars spoke volumes. Perhaps you
    consider yourself a later day Daumier.
    Fields

  • walter fields December 4, 2010, 6:23 pm

    The t-shirt Assange wore in an interview the other day
    was more profound than the logorrhea of your loyal
    fans. The image of a steamshovel and beneath it, in
    Norwegian, ‘Dig down into time’.
    As for you referring to Assange as an impresario, it
    was consistent with the vicious and vicious-lite attacks
    from the top of the pyramid and the willing followers
    below. I would have liked to fashion my comments as
    an ad hominem attack on you – as you have done to
    Assange – but I realized that there was no man present.
    In contempt.
    Walter Fields

    &&&&&&

    David Brooks wrote a column the other day has changed my mind about Assange, who evidently divulged publicly the technology behind a device the U.S. was using to prevent roadside bombs from exploding. For this alone, Assange should be hanged. I regret having characterized an anarchist as a mere impresario. RA

  • David December 1, 2010, 6:58 pm

    Oh, darn–So it’s B of A?? I was so, so hoping that it would be JPM.

  • nonplused December 1, 2010, 6:55 pm

    Wikileaks = CIA. It’s a psy-op. After bankleak they nationalize the financial system with the support of the voters. Hello tyranny. The only thing surprising is how easy it is to get everyone all riled up over things we already knew.

    I haven’t heard one leak that I wouldn’t have guessed to be the case, with the exception of how the US is portrayed as the good guy fighting for what’s right in a world of insanity in all the leaks. This tone in the leaks leads me to suspect all of the documents were carefully crafted before being released.

    If this guy was about to release anything damaging the internet would go down until his servers had been isolated and sanitized. It’s not like they can’t just unplug stuff. They can. Therefore, it has government approval.

    I’m sure the CIA knows how to launch a denial of service attack that would paralyze a whole country, so if this site was really considered a threat it would be down.

    The nasty stuff on the internet has to stay under the radar screen. As soon as you attract enough attention to rouse the authorities from their sleepy pron-surfing slumber, they will turn you off. Everybody has this idea that the internet is some sort of “free space” not subject to official manipulation. It’s not. It’s a fancy telephone system with a bunch of computers connected to it.

    • warren December 1, 2010, 8:26 pm

      Agreed. Wikileaks is just a diversion. It is meant to take everyone’s attention away from what is really happening.

    • Rich December 2, 2010, 12:23 am

      Dance with the Stars maybe;
      Sleep with the fishes unlikely.
      When Project Mockingbird Time Magazine trumpets JA winning their poll for Man of the Year, there’s got to be something to it.
      JA claimed the moral high ground in the Skype Time interview, won all 100 legal cases filed against him, called for HRC’s resignation, a neat hat trick if the Company can pull it all off.
      Meanwhile Santa Claus rally like Channukah seems to have come early this year.
      Inclined to be long at least small cap stocks like LVLT>57 and cents. They present next wednesday at UBS. Here’s what we may not see:
      http://www.powershow.com/view/d759-MjVkN/LVLT
      http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?s=lvlt

    • Rich December 2, 2010, 12:36 am

      Dance with the Stars? – maybe he already is.
      Doubtful JA will soon sleep with the fishes.
      Time Magazine Skype interview gave JA the high moral ground, having won all 100 legal cases, calling for HRC’s resignation, winning the TM Man of the Year Poll, all a hat trick for the Company if it so happens.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

      We’re inclined to agree with Rick the Santa Claus rally seems to have come early this year along with Chanukah.

      We are buying LVLT>57 and 83 cents, a small cap for January Effect with deep pocket sponsors that seem right in the middle of the TSA, Cybersecurity and Comcast Toll Roads.
      LVLT presents next Wednesday at UBS.
      Here’s an LVLT slide show you may not see

      http://www.powershow.com/view/d759-MjVkN/LVLT

      http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?lvlt

      Cheers all*Rich

    • Howg December 2, 2010, 3:38 am

      Oscar Wilde: “The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.”

  • Lon December 1, 2010, 6:38 pm

    The US and the world in general was peeved when the first wiki lists came out……but, now when the big money banks are about to be revealed about their wrong doing, an arrest warrant is given . Big banks and money have always ruled. Just look back in history. Assasinations of all our presidents had to do with big money and the banking cabal.
    Money Rules and will continue to til the end of time.

  • DG December 1, 2010, 4:22 pm

    Wikileaks best product is more cynics.

    Folks have to reverse the lifetime of brainwashing and the daily overdose that they receive. Turn off the indoctrination machine, er, TV, put down the remote, and start thinking. Bone up on basic math, too, if necessary.

    Although Wikileaks produces no surprises for many, it has to open eyes of others and at least, get them thinking a little….

    On another note, a question:
    1) How is all this “secure” data so insecure?

    Probably, along the lines of the shoe bomber….the guy gets a British passport in Belgium. Flys to Paris. Buys a one way ticket from Paris to US with cash and no luggage (remember, this was all post 9-11)…….and we solve the problem by making everyone else take off their shoes……

    we’re from the government and we are here to help.

    • mikeck December 1, 2010, 7:30 pm

      At the risk of being accused of donning my tin foil hat, the shoe bomber, like the undies bomber was a government op…often called a drill or test at some later date when few are paying attention.

      Anyone having any doubts about this needs to turn off the TV and do some research…do ya really think it was an accident that naked body scanners were announced soon after the Christmas day event and that the scanners had already been ordered. Resistance to their use was starting to build at the time but nowhere near what it has reached now. They could never have been sold to the public , as necessary security improvements, without an event.

      Just saying,
      Mike

  • Jeff Kahn December 1, 2010, 3:50 pm

    The Wiki Leaks expose on B of A coming up is really what the government is nervous about. This other “national security” stuff is just a pretext to go after them and try to shut them up before they release the B of A info.

    • Robert December 1, 2010, 6:37 pm

      Agree-

      If BofA is the WikiLeaks target (as many are speculating) then that’s the swan song for that particular TBTF…. They are already under attack as the grim reality of the Countrywide and Merril Lynch disasters is simmering back to the surface.

  • Lyonwiss December 1, 2010, 2:55 pm

    The only real difference between the government and the bureaucrats of the former Soviet Union and the governments and the bureaucrats of other countries is that those of the Soviet Union had much more power and therefore were much more corrupt. The wars that the US wage, including the wars in the middle east and the war on terror, give the US more and more power over its citizens and stench of corruption is so strong that even US patriots want to change and therefore leak information to the rest of world, in order to save America. WikiLeaks seeks to strengthen democracy by disseminating the truth, however crass and ugly. It deserves a Nobel Prize!

  • roger erickson December 1, 2010, 2:54 pm

    ps: no one’s mentioned what was to me the best line; that China is ready to dump North Korea & allow reunification.

    You have to suppose that the quid-pro-quo is that we allow their reunification with Taiwan. They get what they want, and don’t have the expense of shooting & deaths.

    Any bets?

    • mario cavolo December 1, 2010, 3:04 pm

      interesting roger…the thing is that a good-sized chunk of China’s reasoning in supporting and dealing with NK is not so complex, but simply wanting to avoid a NK collapse and the ensuing messy mass exodus of millions across the border into the mainland…Cheers, Mario

    • Tom Paine December 1, 2010, 4:10 pm

      Eegads! As someone who lived in Taiwan for 13 years and has a pro independence Taiwanese wife, I certainly hope that is not in the cards. Except for some of the families of the soldiers that came to Taiwan with Jiang Jieshi (Chiang Kai-shek), there are very few Taiwanese who would welcome a reunification under the present regime in the PRC, if ever.

      China has little historical claim to Taiwan, only having settled it about 400 years ago, when it looked like maybe the Portugese, Spanish or Dutch might beat them to it. At that time a Ming dynasty hero drove out the foreign devils and held out for a while against the foreign (Manchu) Qing dynasty. The Qing did have a tenuous grip on the island for some time before losing control to Japan in 1895. In 1945 it was restored to the Republic of China, and Jiang Jieshi set up operations on the island after being driven off the mainland by the communists.

      Therefore, Taiwan has never been a part of the People’s Republic of China, and I hope it will stay that way until such time as perhaps the PRC may democratize.

    • Robert December 1, 2010, 6:02 pm

      Interesting tangent on the subject of Taiwan, especially in light of the other recent news that is not being picked up by the MSM about the matter of 700 Billion Taiwanese dollars that was supposed to be deposited with a US Bank in 2004, and the BIS processed the Debit, and then sat on thier hands while the US Federal Reserve failed to issue the corresponding credit to the American account holder (Tropos Capital Corp)

      The story seems absolutely real. The ACAT is posted on scribD, as are the letters from Tropos to the BIS. If it is a hoax, then one has to ask “why” to the effort of fabricating these documents (similar to the question of “why” regarding the two Asians that were stopped by the Italians trying to sneak Billions in alleged US Bond certificates into Sweden in early 2009)

      I’m inclined to agree with JohnJay above- the political world is coming unglued at the seams, and yet, no one is shooting yet, so it is really more of a spectator sport at this point. Let’s hope it stays that way.

      Regarding WikiLeaks- who saw the clip of the Canadian Whack-job calling for the assassination of Assange on CBS News?

      I mean, the same right wing nutcases who live in utter fear of Radical islam are now issuing their own Fatwas against people who (in America at least) are supposed to have their freedoms of expression protected by the Constitution… ?

      The insanity is almost palpable. I applaud Wikileaks, and my biggest fear is that there are people who will use WikiLeaks as a rallying cry to jump in line behind idiots like Jay Rockefeller and try to further subjugate freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

      Rick- I share your cynicism on most things, but Freedoms of personal expression (even the freedom to expose hypocrisy and immorality in others) must be preserved… it is one of teh basic human dignities that MUST be fought for.

    • Steve December 1, 2010, 6:48 pm

      Robert, u.s. has been committing extra-judicial murder for years across the globe via various black-opps. Why stop now with Free Speech. In the name of democracy the act of the individual is insured by the honor of the masses making all share guilt equally.

    • Larry D December 1, 2010, 7:45 pm

      I sort of agree with you, Robert…but…is treason an equivalent form of freedom of expression? Was Aldrich Ames just trying to get the word out?

      Also, I don’t know if Salman Rushdie is, or Freddie Van Gogh was, a right-wing nutcase. I think Freddie was kind of lefty, for all the good it did for him.

    • Robert December 1, 2010, 7:57 pm

      You know it, Steve, and I don’t think they WILL stop with free speech- in fact, in a bizarre sense I’m COUNTING on it.

      We have already crossed the threshold. The fact that there is not riotting in the streets does not mean the threshold has not been crossed. Laws intended to oppress people and supress the Constitution may still be forthcoming, but each one will turn up the burner beneath the simmering public by another notch.

      The “Public”, or “the taxpayer”, or “the citizenry” are simply faceless monikers to the idiots in Washington. Simply stated- they can’t kill everybody, and each person that ends up dead will be another person that could have been you (or me) – how can this not continue to inspire the revolutionary spirit within the masses?

      Go watch the movie “V for Vendetta” if you don’t understand what I mean…

    • Martin Snell December 2, 2010, 3:19 am

      Taiwan is a free and independent nation. It is a scandal that most of the world refuses to recognize this fact.

  • roger erickson December 1, 2010, 2:50 pm

    Biggest impact I see is the exposure of duplicity by ruling classes, to an extent that even the not-yet-cynical cannot ignore.
    Maybe even pop bimbos now, “uh, sort of, you know [not] trust our president”?

    After reading news in any time, no adult can escape the fact that all gov policy channels are overly influenced by overly narrow lobby interests. The watershed we’re going to see is a re-balancing of the massive feedback necessary to run large nation states.

    Even the self-anointed TBTF are now [slowly!] relearning Aesop’s 2000 yr old tale of the stomach & limbs learning that they cannot do without one another – this time on a national scale.

    You can lead people to unbelievable amounts of brains and data – but you can’t make them think.

  • mario cavolo December 1, 2010, 2:34 pm

    Just two cents worth as I find myself this year way overusing the words “without precedent” and unprecedented. As is the incredible shifts in balance of power and East/West societal foundations, we are experiencing; I can only put forth a single defining statement that explains it: “the rise of Asia led by asset-rich China synchronous with the decline of the West led by the debt-ridden U.S.” . That in a nutshell, defines the times we live in. More so, that massive paradigm being transmitted across an instantaneous global cybernet…incredible the times we live! In sociology, there’s a concept called “cultural lag”. It means, stuff changes way too fast in the society and the citizen’s ability to adjust and adapt mentally and emotionally lags behind; we’re only human.

    And now this!!; a whole new paradigm on the idea that really important stuff needs to stay private, especially regarding matters of national security and diplomacy and ethics and blah, blah, blah…all out the window across the globe in a day’s time! Once again we have concepts and principles rooted in values and ideologies that have guided our decision-making and actions, our thoughts, our sense of how to behave, what to say, blown to smithereens, redefining the idea of “what a circus, what a fiasco!” As I wrote at my blog lambasting the NY Times for publishing even with their “redacting” , I just don’t know what else to say!

    In the age of the unprecedented unthinkable (damn that’s a great title for a book) it would be a mistake to assume that most of the fallout will be “negative” in nature; consider that this exposed, complex web could somehow cause shifts in thinking and approaches and trends in ways unexpectedly, unprecedentedly, unthinkably good and positive!! Hey, why not? Where’s Norman Vincent Peale when you need him?

    Cheers all, Mario

  • Martin Snell December 1, 2010, 2:27 pm

    Kudo’s to Wikileaks for drawing back the veil of hypocrisy. In a world of corporate media and continuous lying spin it is a breath of fresh air to read “real” information (whether we suspected it or not – now we know).

    The best quote I saw out of this was in today’s world “a digital secret is an oxymoron”.

    Expect lots more to come. Now bring on the BofA dump.

    • Robert December 1, 2010, 7:44 pm

      Martin and TahoeBilly are both applying interesting perspectives here:

      TahoeBilly references the Mayan 2012 “unmasking” and Martin Snell uses the term “drawing back the veil ”

      Both are appropriate tradition definitions of the term Apocalypse. I believe that history will regard this period as just that, as the foundations of a corrupt system simply gave way and crumbled.

      Many seem scared that the fall of Rome ushered in the Middle Ages (and I will remind everyone that the Feudal Royals rose to power because their families had the foresight to abandon the Roman currency for Gold :)), and yet others see the Mayan prophecy as the heralding in of a new age for humanity- another Rennaisance, if you will…

      Information is key. Beneath all information is an underlying truth, even if the information itself, is untruthful.

      I think everyone simply worries about
      whether they can/will survive what the next decade brings. All I can say is that the fall of Rome was survived by 99% of the citizenry- the ones who did not survive were those who chose to fight to preserve the corrupt system. Oppression is a powerful force, yet it collapses when the light of truthful scrutiny is shone upon it.

      Social and political elites can not control a planet of individuals- period. It is logistally impossible. Therefore, we must welcome the bogus One World Government, because once there is only one government, it will only take a single overthrow to usher in the global restoration of individual liberty.

  • John Jay December 1, 2010, 2:01 pm

    Situation Normal.
    The only way the madness will end is with financial collapse.
    Otherwise, the politicians in the USA will continue with endless meddling in international affairs, and our troops will continue to cost trillions, as our clumsy, murderous foreign policy makes us more hated everyday.
    While at home, the federal government tightens it grip on our disintegrating society.
    No more incandescent light bulbs, Federal toliet standards, street sign mandates, not to mention the real estate/foreclosure/banking fiasco.
    And the Federal Reserve/GS/JPM/Triumvirate.
    Et cetera, et cetera, ad infinitum.
    The governments of this planet have lost their collective minds.

  • Benjamin December 1, 2010, 1:44 pm

    I haven’t kept up with this story, as there’s been too much crap to keep up with as it were. But what I’ve incidentally come across, I’ve gotten the impression that these leaks are what “Climategate” was to the UN IPCC.
    Anyone surprised that governments conspire and act immorally…

    Man… What Pluto have you been vacationing on?!

  • TahoeBilly December 1, 2010, 7:58 am

    A rare miss by Rick.
    Wikileaks is the “great unmasking”! This is the Maya 2012 stuff Rick! Governments all over the world having their paints pulled down, simultaneously. This is completely unprecedented.

    The Russian’s being unmasked at “thugs”. The Saudi’s as blanket Israel partnered Iran basher’s. This is it! This is the simply fact Governments work together to steal from the little guy, while the play boo-boo boy with each other.

    The great unmasking is here. They can follow us and watch us and make us uncomfortable all day long, but not the snake has turned, all we are all watching THEM!

    Not your sharpest critique Rick, this is planetary changing events of the Mayan calendar type. A French Revolution without all the mess.

    • Rick Ackerman December 1, 2010, 8:34 am

      So which Wikileaks really and truly surprised you, Billy? Speaking for myself, I’ve yet to come across a single one, including the ostensible “bombshell” concerning the Saudis.

      How cynical am I? Well, let’s just say that if Ben Bernanke had been outed for saying the Federal Reserve was created to help banks enslave the little guy, I’d lay odds the Fed would still be here in five years, even if Bernanke would not; and that Ron Paul would NOT be president.

      You can wake me when they build a hangin’ scaffold in King’s Beach, okay?

  • Steve December 1, 2010, 7:38 am

    Nothing much changes. The gossip got caught. The gossip tries to displace the blame for the gossip’s inauthenticity and lack of moral character upon others. U.S. citizens continue to believe the Bison were killed by hunters, the U.S. did not violently overthrow the Sandwich Islands, and the U.S. did not use smallpox to destroy the Native Americans after warning the Blackfeet via Lewis and Clark, [read Bodner, and Maxi 1832] [also check out Cap. Jack of the Modocs]. That little bit leaves out a thousand Sand Creek, and Wounded Knee abuses against other cultures. In regard to the British puppets having fear. Yes, the Saudi puppets fear their own people even more than they fear Iran. The Middle East is a story of British abuse since 1900. We should all love the Colorado Volunteers for taking off their uniforms before the slaughter at Sand Creek of women and children. And we should stand proud at the Volunteers wearing the private parts of women as they rode back to the citizens. The U.S. got caught gossiping. The spin begins. Nothing much changes.