(My response to Mario Cavolo’s “rosy” economic outlook kicked off such a spirited discussion in the forum that I am letting it run for a second day. Let me mention, however, that Mario himself has spurned my “optimist” label and said that he sees no roses, only reality. He lays out his case in a post that, as of early Tuesday evening, could be found at the end of the discussion thread. RA )
No one doubts that optimists like you will be essential when it comes time to rebuild the economy. Might I suggest that you save your energy for later, when it will do the most good, rather than risk squandering even a small amount of it arguing in a forum where you’re outnumbered twenty to one? Much creative destruction remains to occur before America can get back on track, and only a great deal of pain can bring about the epiphany that the illusion of our economic well-being has been sustained entirely by lies. (Fortunately, that is not true of our economic future, since Yankee know-how can never be counted out. But merely financing Yankee know-how will require re-allocating capital from a still-vastly overvalued financial sector to one that efficiently turns out real goods and services that the rest of the world vitally needs.)
For the present, however, The Great Recession has dealt America’s standard of living a mortal blow, steepening our decline in ways that are likely to continue for perhaps a generation. The upper strata of earners has not gotten away unscathed, as you would have us infer, even if the fraudulent, Fed-engineered stock market rally launched exactly two years ago has eased the pain of their dot-com and real estate losses. The stock market must now crash too, since it is buoyed by an all-but-irresistible tide of funny money. Ultimately, however, nearly all classes of assets save bullion, farmland and a few others are destined for collapse as well, since current valuations are based on a money system whose basic unit of measure is an already worthless dollar. The rentiers and middle class are not going to escape this inevitable phase of our economic cleansing.
Colleges Selling a Hoax
I don’t have the time to refute you point-for-point, but to take just one economic “positive” that you’ve cited – the fact that U.S. colleges are not deserted – it is possible to argue that the colleges are as big a fraud as our money system, channeling more and more undergrads toward worthless graduate degrees (how many more young lawyers, for one, can the system absorb?) because there are presently no jobs for them. You of all people should be acutely aware of this problem, since it is hugely worse for China, where even kids with the engineering degrees that their American counterparts have disdained cannot find jobs in the city above the sweat-shot level. It is not possible to overstate the potentially dire consequences of this for China, especially if exports to the U.S. dry up.
As further regards China, surely they recognize that their USA partner is a Ponzi scheme operator – a book-cooking, funnymoney-printing, lie-peddling swindler who will eventually take them down. Just recently, for instance, following a report in the London Financial Times that the Federal Reserve had supplanted China as the largest holder of Treasury paper, the U.S. Treasury rejiggered the numbers so that China came out on top. It is disconcerting enough that Treasury can swing these totals by, in this case, more than $200 billion while evidently making it impossible for anyone to ferret out the empirical truth. But what makes the adjustment all the more insidious is that it was intended to make the public believe that China is confident in the U.S. Bloomberg news, for one, appears to have swallowed this load of crap in toto, reporting that “China’s Treasury holdings underscore the [Chinese] government’s confidence in President Barack Obama’s stewardship of the economy.” Yeah, sure. This stench-ridden subterfuge was not reported widely if at all, but it was duly noted in the latest edition of The Privateer, a superb newsletter published twice a month by Aussie Bill Buckler. China, for its part, has not commented on the “adjustment.”
(If you’d like to have Rick’s Picks commentary delivered free each day to your e-mail box, click here.)
Thanks Mario for your extensive replies to many questions. To debate is educating, to attack is ignorance.
It is very helpful to have someone with your perspective join(provoke) discussion. I lived in India for a few years recently and wondered about the differences between Chindia, having not been to China. Now I have a better idea, although, I admit, actually going to China would be better. So thanks…
A few points: Yes, the USD is the reserve currency and Euro is alternative. RMB may one day be the leader, but without intl acceptance it is just another domestic(soft) currency.
I understand your “relative” values regarding each currency, but as Steve often points out, the intrinsic value is zero and, therefore, the entire system is built with a foundation of air. The monetary system is nothing more than a means of keeping score where the value of the score keeps changing(down). I will stand with history on the future of the USD. Fiat currency has a 100% failure rate. The USD will be no different.
You say 100 million folks in the US are doing better than ever. How do you come up with this number? If I were to guess, I’d say 10 million at the most. But, more importantly, for every one that rises to the top, how many fall to the bottom. It is that ratio(which I’m sure has been rising) that has America in decline. Not the number at the top that you claim will save the day.
I look forward to you continuing to share your unique perspective. BTW, if “your wife’s mother in law is expecting”, congratulations on your new sister in N China? I guess they also have some funny familial relationships too. 😉