Heinz Insider Was Dumber than Dumb

Some genius bought $90,000 worth of out-of-the-money calls on Heinz shares a day before Buffett tendered for the company, but it looks like he won’t get to collect a dime of the $1.7 million profit the trade produced.  Actually, the trader is a fugitive from justice at the moment, having failed to show up at an SEC hearing last week to explain his astoundingly good timing.  Don’t these guys ever learn?  Buying call options to profit from insider information is like wearing a mechanical holdout device to a card game.  If and when you get caught, which you will, there’s no way to lie your way out of it.  Why do you think the SEC is so keen on prosecuting insider-trading cases?  Convictions come as easy as shooting fish in a barrel, since the paper trail in nearly every instance is so clear and detailed that the trader might as well have presented regulators with a scrapbook celebrating his crime.

This perp reportedly bought the call options through a Swiss account managed by Goldman, so he’s not exactly your average Joe. Goldman claims they don’t have “direct access” to his name, and at this point even the regulators don’t know who he is. But you can bet they’ll collar him eventually, notwithstanding Switzerland’s zeal for protecting the identity of its banking customers, even those who deposit such large sums that the money could only have been stolen. When it comes time for the Swiss to do the right thing, we’re betting they’ll cough up the trader’s identity so that the SEC’s investigators can rack up another score.

Switzerland No Place to Hide

As a put-and-call dealer on the Pacific Exchange years ago, we ourselves were the prey of inside traders operating through brokerage accounts in Switzerland, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.  Although it took years to finally put the lawbreakers behind bars, we can attest to the SEC’s diligence in setting things right. The trades involved the purchase, in the summer and autumn of 1981, of far-out-of-the-money call options on the shares of Santa Fe International, a contract oil driller. With the stock trading in the high teens not long before the October calls were to expire, someone was paying what seemed like ridiculous prices for ostensibly worthless October 30 calls. Exchange traders’ jaws dropped, however, when it was announced after the closing bell on expiration Friday that Kuwait had tendered an offer for the company at $53 per share. This meant that the many thousands of “worthless” October 30 calls the market makers had sold for $25 would have to be covered for more than $2300 apiece. Fortunately for the market makers, the losses were ultimately canceled when regulators figured out the scheme.  Most of the insiders – there were several of them, including a Jordanian — went to prison, including Santa Fe’s treasurer and a former director.

Another case that directly involved us landed pill-tamperer Eddie Marks in prison under a 27-year sentence.  He’d sought to profit from a drop in SmithKline shares after sabotaging some Contac and Dietac capsules with rat poison. We were making markets in SmithKline options at the time and therefore well positioned to see through this scheme. A call to the FBI put them on Eddie’s trail and earned us a $200,000 reward.  In retrospect, we can speculate that Marks might have gotten away with it if he had done the option trade, which involved the purchase of 360 out-of-the-money put options, under an alias. But the Schwab account he used bore his real name, and it was therefore a simple matter for the FBI to match up fingerprints on the Contac and Dietac bottles to fingerprints they had on file for Marks once they had him in their crosshairs.

Bottom line:  If you should ever be tempted to leverage insider information using put or call options, realize that your name is going to flash in neon on some SEC investigator’s computer screen, especially if you don’t ordinarily trade options.

Click here for a free trial subscription to Rick’s Picks, You’ll also gain access to a 24/7 chat room that draws veteran traders from around the world, and to all of our current forecasts and archives.

  • mava February 27, 2013, 4:35 am

    Wow, this page is a hotbed of communism today. I am just going to politely pass and visit you guys another day, when you’re less concerned.

  • Rick Ackerman February 27, 2013, 1:44 am

    I nearly got involved with anti-Walmart crusader Al Norman on a book project but passed on it because the fight seemed futile. Here in Boulder, Walmart bought and renovated a property, keeping their ownership and store plans secret until the last minute to avoid attracting protestors. Boulder takes its anti-Walmarting very seriously, and a growing movement to boycott the store when it opens gets plenty of support in the local newspaper.

    The documentary ‘Walmart: The High Cost of Low Prices’ lays out the case againstWalmart so clearly and in such persuasive detail that anyone who views it is bound to become an anti-Walmart zealot. Most people have figured out that Walmart will eventually lay waste to the retail infrastructure of any small-to-medium-size town.

    The fact that Walmart coaches employees on how to get Medicaid says it all.

    • gary leibowitz February 27, 2013, 5:15 am

      I know all too well the history and tactics. I do believe they even supported China’s dumping of TV’s at uncompetitive prices. Yes, why support American jobs when their only concern is the bottom line.

      BTW, did not yet pull the trigger on shorting the SPX again. If tomorrow we see the SPX above 1505 I will (unless special news breaks on Italy or sequester). I still believe this recent drop has some more downside. I also believe there will not be any compromise as both sides seem entrenched. The Republicans find the automatic cuts more to their liking than the Democrats. We shall soon see. The fight at the OK Corral will be seen this Friday.

  • BigTom February 26, 2013, 9:00 pm

    “They treat workers like a cheap commodity.” Whoa! Gary, are you suggesting our investment dollars should have the same integrity as our moral superiority?

    • gary leibowitz February 26, 2013, 10:15 pm

      No. Just voicing my opinion on companies that decide that profits can only be derived from cheap workers. If WMT went away tomorrow and no other retailer took up its business practice, I would not lament its passing, nor the slightly higher price consumers will have to pay.

  • gary leibowitz February 26, 2013, 8:42 pm

    FYI, sold my 6,000 SPXU for 32.07. Too much of a fast profit to pass up. I expect and hope the market crawls back to perhaps SPX of 1505 (or higher) by end of day. If so I will once again place those shorts. Still expect range to be 1475 to 1445 as the bottom. (completed 2nd bet I promised to post, out of 3).

    The complacency on sequester is going to hit the market once they realize the Republicans mean business this time around. IMHO.

  • chris t. February 26, 2013, 12:32 am

    Rick,

    funny you were a market maker in Resorts.
    When I was still a kid (and my parents pretty much novices in all things market related) a good-friend’s broker/investment manager (and relative, thus helping to calm any mistrust of the market still lingering), who was with Shearson, got them to put a big chunck into Resorts.
    After churning their account over and over, you know how that whole story ended.

    When one reads the bio of Joseph Kennedy and his money-making stories in the ’20s, or FDR’s sons famous comment about the tip he received from, but didn’t follow up on, B. Baruch, you realize that this whole edifice has pretty much always been of the size it’s had to help the few fleece the masses.

    I stick by my referrals to Howard Katz and his point about this being a zero-sum game barring inflation (the speculating protion of the market, not the investment portion = yield) despite all the fancy math from the Jeremy Siegel’s of this world….

    • chris t. February 26, 2013, 12:41 am

      btw, I think that is another way perhaps only indirectly encompassed by Mises’ saying that inflation is the unseen tax robbing the masses:

      the natural risk-avoidance most people have is overcome by the need for SOME return on savings that less risky approaches than the equities can no longe provide, due to that inflation.
      Government, even without it being set-up that way by these beneficiaries, likes it because it forces people to above-ground their savings, making them discoveralbe, and thus taxable.
      Even phantom gains, which is most of the nominal returns these days.

      Did you see that Lib-Dem proposal in the UK about asset taxation per-se, and giving their int. revenue inspectors blanket home-entry permission to assess compliance?
      Yet another example where Bill-of-Rights-less Britain is showing us the future

  • Rich February 25, 2013, 9:00 pm

    Edifice complex?:

    AAPL, FB and GOOG all building fancy new HQ Buildings.

    In the past this marked company tops, if not industry, sector or market tops…

    • Jill February 26, 2013, 3:38 am

      AAPL is getting a lot of competition from Samsung & others who can make similar products cheaper. Facebook is just for people with time on their hands, until they realize they have no privacy & then they quit it. But GOOG is still a competitive company, as far as I can see. If we have a market pullback, I guess GOOG will pull back too. But I’ll bet it will be a market leader agian, once any correction runs its course.

    • gary leibowitz February 26, 2013, 6:08 am

      Of them all GOOG has the smartest management and very focused for future trends. FB has the potential to make a lot of money “if” they can figure out how to capitalize on the massive audience without alienating them. Personally I hope they flame out. AAPL has the same mentality as the founder of FB and WMT. They treat workers like a cheap commodity.

  • Rich February 25, 2013, 7:54 pm
  • Rich February 25, 2013, 6:28 pm

    Had client with naked calls short on SDC when that takeout occurred. Wiped out a lot of easy premium profits. Good lesson in risk/reward imbalance.

    Insider trading selectively enforced.

    George Soros got hit with it and claims it was unfounded. Robert Rubin as GS Chair took the other side of his S&P short trade on 20 October 1987 knowing the NYSE would open after saying they would stay closed.

    Reported Alex Brown/DeutscheBank clients bought the most 9-11 puts and they were too well-connected to prosecute.

    Anyone who doesn’t realize some people have access to everyone’s book and back may be missing the big picture.

    Inclined to think we may have a trading top…

    • max lopez February 27, 2013, 6:58 pm

      rick iam asorry . you are beging to sound more and more like a shill for the sytem as a whole… this whole market is front run for the big firms . computers on floor so they can get fractions of second sadvandtage etc etc. etc.
      to point out one idiot in this heinze case , to say o gee look how well the syetm works is absurd..
      this is a market where th big guys can stela all they like and the little guy gets it in the keister..

      this heinz thing should be procecuted. obviously. but
      come on .
      this system workks??
      as long a syou understand the fix is in, it is crooked and trade accordingly.
      grow up.!!!

  • chris t. February 25, 2013, 5:22 pm

    “If and when you get caught, which you will, . Why do you think the SEC is so keen on prosecuting insider-trading cases?
    …since the paper trail in nearly every instance is so clear and detailed …”

    I guess that only applies to call-options trades?
    Because none of what you write above seems to be correct for the airline-put-options bought just ahead of 9-11.
    “We can’t figure out who did it”.
    No one to my knowledge has ever been prosecuted, nor charged.

    “…notwithstanding Switzerland’s zeal for protecting the identity of its banking customers, even those who deposit such large sums that the money could only have been stolen. When it comes time for the Swiss to do the right thing…”

    Seeing as you were on the short-end once of such shenanigans, I can see why you feel that way.

    But as you do pay attention to the libertarian philosophy, you must surely be aware of the economic case AGAINST these types of rules, made persuasively more than once.

    It is really a non-crime.
    As to the Swiss:
    rather than lambasting them for this, the anti-statist case is to cheer them on, and to bemoan their co-operation and sell-out of principle.

    if the Swiss did the right thing, they would give the SEC, etc the one-digit salut.
    Of course you know they won’t do that, they’ve kow-towed every time lately.

    Of course, the guy you menti0n is an idiot for doing it so transparently.

    • chris t. February 25, 2013, 5:24 pm

      oh, in the above, after “No one to my knowledge has ever been prosecuted, nor charged.”,
      I ment to insert that famous little phrase from the Order of the Garter:
      “honi soi qui mal y pense”

    • Rick Ackerman February 25, 2013, 6:38 pm

      For the record, I am against prosecuting insider trading — so much so that although I’d never much cared for Martha Stewart, I was rooting for her when she was targeted by the SEC. I see these prosecutions as hypocritical, since MOST of the trades that occur in today’s markets are front-run by firms that know quite a bit more than you do. This was certainly true of trades that occurred on the floor of the PSE over the years I worked there. Regulators never lifted a finger to do anything about it because it mainly involved trading professionals cheating and stealing from other professionals. When I was making markets in the options of Resorts Intnl, to take one example, Bear Stearns was an amazingly astute trader of options on Resorts’ shares. They also happened to be Resort’s investment banker.

      Concerning the puts supposedly purchased just ahead of 9/11, I don’t recall the details, perhaps because they weren’t very persuasive. If the story is true, though, the buyers of those puts would have been as transparently exposed as whoever bought the calls on Heinz. As I tried to make clear, the paper trail is almost impossible to obfuscate.

    • Ed Hoarse February 27, 2013, 5:04 am

      I was trading gold and tech stocks on 9/11, I did pull up the option chains of Delta Airlines and American Airlines, huge amount of open interest well outside the norm for any other period. The data was available for a few days and the puff along with silence and any body who claims that it existed was labeled a nut.