Although the impulse leg in the conventional pattern shown was not very powerful, it was persistent enough that I'll give the bearish interpretation of this chart the benefit of the doubt. That means that GDXJ is on a 'mechanical'-short signal triggered on first contact with the green line. That implies that GDXJ is more likely to fall to p=33.73 than continue its ascent toward C=39.82. Regardless, I doubt that sellers will be able to push it down to D=27.63. _______ UPDATE (Mar 20, 5:52 p.m.): Use the 42.10 target of this large reverse pattern as a minimum upside projection for now. _______ UPDATE (Mar 21, 10:46 a.m.): I've flagged the 38.15 target of this reverse pattern on the weekly chart as a significant impediment and potential rally-stopper. It's worth shorting for a scalp, but my gut feeling is that it will give way, allowing further progress to the 42.10 target noted above.
The 'mechanical' buy triggered on Thursday when TLT fell to the green line (x=93.40) is looking like hell at the moment, with the steep fall over the last two weeks showing no sign of abating. However, 'mechanical' entries are never supposed to feel warm and fuzzy, since they are designed to exploit the vicious shakeouts that can occur when overly eager buyers get too far ahead of themselves. All we can do now is wait and see whether TLT takes a one-level bounce to the red line without exceeding C=92.01 to the downside.
For nearly a year, I've promoted the idea that the post-covid bull rampage would end when Microsoft shares hit $430. They effectively achieved that benchmark on Friday with a pre-dawn print at 428.95 that gave way to a $16 plunge. If this was not THE top, it certainly felt like A top, and a potentially important one. However, before we draw any conclusions, let's see if the selloff gets legs, since we don't want to underestimate the power of a market that has been in the grip of mass psychosis since October. If there were any doubt about this, consider how stocks have rallied into the Fed's decision to stay tight even after investors had deluded themselves into expecting aggressive easing in 2024. Originally I'd picked Apple as our infallible bellwether, because it is the most valuable company in the world, and because its shares are so heavily owned by institutions. But so are Microsoft's, with a key difference: Although iPhone sales are poised to implode in the severe economic downturn that's coming, Microsoft is unlikely to feel much pain even in the hardest of times. That's because revenues from Microsoft 365 will continue to flow from more than 60 million subscribers, regardless of the economy's condition. The company's earnings are nearly bomb-proof, and that it is why it is arguably the best stock in the world to own, as well as the most important stock to follow. When it is rising strongly, the broad averages cannot fall; if it falls, it will take the broad averages with it. What If? However, the technical picture is not complete without considering the very bullish chart of the S&P 500. It says that before the 15-year-old bull market ends, the S&Ps are likely to hit 6118.34, a 20% gain from current levels.
Even though last week's extension of bull-mania exceeded the 5220.00 target shown by only a smidgen, it's still creepy. The 'hidden' resistance should have held, if for no other reason than that the pattern is too gnarly to be common knowledge. Granted, the point 'B' high is pork sausage, as noted here last week. But that's still not a good reason for its target to have been exceeded so easily. The rally did reverse to produce a close beneath the target, so it's still possible we'll see rationality reassert itself in the week ahead with a persuasive plunge. Unfortunately, SPY failed by two points to achieve a corresponding target at 520.54 before the sell-off began, so we took no short position with puts. _______ UPDATE (March 13, 11:03 a.m. EDT): The minor rally pattern shown has already produced two 'mechanical' winners while becoming increasingly gnarly, so expect it to produce a third profitable trade: shorting D=5287.25 when the futures get there. A small reverse pattern should be suitable for this purpose, but be sure to take a small partial profit if it works. You could also buy a pullback to p2=5204.00 'mechanically,' stop 5176.25.
The pattern shown was compelling enough to suggest that MSFT might make a top at the D target, 420.26. But THE top? My guess is not, which would make all of the jacking off for the last month a consolidation. It certainly doesn't look like it's setting up a plunge, although that could change very easily with a downdraft that penetrates three supportive lows recorded since January 31. In any event, I have no trading ideas to begin the week, so we'll have to see what develops.
Although I promoted a 2307 target here last week, I'm going to dial it back a little with the 2276.60 target of a larger pattern. For reasons of clarity alone, it should take precedence over the higher number, and therefore be viewed as a potential rally-stopper. In any case, resistances at both p and p2 were violated so brutally that there should be little doubt about using 2276.60 as a minimum upside projection. The rally was too steep even when it began early last week to catch an easy ride. The same conditions will likely obtain this week, so any attempt to get aboard would need to come from an intraday set-up on the lesser charts.
I characterized last week's price action as 'mildly discouraging' in the chart (see inset), but compared to gold's stellar performance, Silver's dirge was not merely discouraging, but pathetic. The rally stalled almost precisely at p=24.76 of a pattern that projects to 27.34, and I can offer no assurances that the resistance will get pulped next week. Whatever happens, I doubt that gold can go much higher without dragging silver along. Please note that a pullback to the green line (x=23.47) would trigger an appealing mechanical' buy, stop 22.18.
It's hard to be cautious after last week's steep, powerful rally, but we should take heed nonetheless that GDXJ would trigger a 'mechanical' short at x=36.77. I am not suggesting this, since the set-up, with a weak but lengthy impulse leg, is hardly ideal. But we should monitor price action closely after it's hit, since that's why we use charts in the first place -- i.e., to stay objectively on top of the trend no matter what we might think.
'Mechanical' buying opportunities are not supposed to feel like opportunities, since the buying often occurs with the trading vehicle falling hard to the green line. The Dollar Index got hit three days in a row last week, sending it plummeting to x=102.56, where a 'mechanical' buy was signaled. Instead of leaping on the trade I'll suggest paper trading it, the better to observe how an unappetizing possibility extricates itself from a bog. For the trade to work, DXY would need to rally to the red line without first dipping below C=100.62. _______ UPDATE (Mar 17): So far, so good: DXY has rallied from the green line and reached the midway point between the line and the midpoint Hidden Pivot at 104.50. At that price, taking a theoretical profit on 50% of the position would be in order.
Bitcoin mania looks likely to blow itself out at somewhat higher levels. The bitcoin ETF chart above suggests buyers will encounter significant resistance at 64.95, a Hidden Pivot target that lies 5% above Friday's closing price. If this impediment gives way easily or is exceeded for two consecutive weeks on a closing basis, however, you can expect more upside to the alternative target at 70.35. That's fully 14% above these levels, and although that might seem to portend a powerful move, especially if it occurs in a matter of days, it would probably come as a huge disappointment to countless bitcoin fanatics who have been weaned and nurtured on predictions of $100,000 or more. I doubt we'll see anything like that, especially since the shitballs who control bitcoin, Black Rock chief among them, will have reaped more than their directors could spend in a thousand lifetimes if it climbs 'only' another 14% . It is for their benefit that regulators approved bitcoin ETFs in the first place, making the cryptocurrency affordable to riff-raff who had been priced out of the market even at its bear-market low near $15,000 in January 2023. Fractional ownership, including with leveraged options, made it possible for kids who were collecting Pokemon cards just a few years ago to become players in the global casino. Virtual Tulips It's hard to imagine how high tulip-bulb prices would have climbed if Dutch teenagers had had access to virtual tulips in 1637, when the mania peaked. We are going to find out, though, when the crypto blowoff sputters out, as all manias eventually do, for lack of greater fools. In the meantime, here's a link to a recent interview I did with Howe Street's Jim Goddard. It explains why bitcoin would be more reasonably priced at $1-$2 instead of
