Option Trades Must Be Worked to Beat the Odds

First things first, for those who don’t already receive these commentaries by e-mail: If you’d like to be entered in a weekly drawing to win a three-month subscription to Rick’s Picks worth $106, click here. What do paying subscribers get that lurkers don’t?  Plenty. Yesterday, for instance, they were advised to cover half of a bullish position we’d staked out in GDXJ, a vehicle popular with the gold crowd that tracks junior mining stocks. We paid an average 1.85 for some August near-the-money call options, but because the stock has been strong this week, we were able to exit half of them yesterday for 2.25, a nickel off the high. The implied 40-cent profit has effectively reduced the costs basis of the calls we still hold to 1.45.  Considering that the options have more than four months till expiration, odds of making a profit look pretty good.

Ordinarily, the odds are horrendous for retail customers who simply buy puts or calls based on hunches. How bad are the odds?  If it’s a bearish hunch your playing, you’ve got a better chance of making money by matching three numbers on a lotto ticket. I’ve been trading options for nearly 40 years, twelve of them on an exchange floor, and have yet to meet a single person who has made money on put options over time. The odds aren’t much better for buy-and-hold call buyers, either. All options are “wasting assets” because their value decreases as their expiration date draws near.  Because of this, options positions must be “worked” to produce a profit.

The Option ‘Sweet Spot’

One way we might work our August call position is to sell other calls against it. For example, if the stock continues to rally, we might be able to sell August 25 calls for 0.45 apiece. That would give us a bullish “vertical calendar spread” on which it would be very  difficult to lose money. The best outcome we could hope for would be for GDXJ, which settled yesterday at 23.80, to be trading just below 25 when the April options expire next Friday. We would simply pocket the 0.45 premium, further reducing the effective cost basis of our August calls to 1.00.  Capturing the “juice” in an option that has just a week or two left is the sweet spot of option trading. Near-the-money options are typically at their most overvalued just before they die.

Ideally, we would repeat this tactic, shorting, in successive months, May calls, then Junes, and finally Julys. If GDXJ were to stagnate or move steadily higher between now and August, it’s conceivable that our “covered” (as opposed to naked) sales of soon-to-expire calls would more than offset the 1.85 we originally paid for the “Auggies”. In the meantime, our “edge” would have come, simply, from having bought the August calls at the right moment, when GDXJ was bottoming last week.  Granted, there’s always a chance the stock could crash through the recent low. But it would have to fall pretty hard to turn our August calls into losers. With a little more work, though, we may be able to reduce their costs basis to less than zero, making a loss impossible. Subscribe and you’ll have an opportunity to come along for the ride.  For seven days’ free access to all of our services, including detailed daily trading recommendations and a 24/7 chat room that draws traders from around the world, click here.

  • Bradley April 16, 2012, 4:39 am

    Don’t know much about options…
    Can’t predict flash crashes…
    What I can say is that I’ve been tracking the ratio between numismatic gold coins and spot, and we are back to prices on numismatics where spot gold was in the low $900’s. Miners are acting poorly. Somethin’s gotta give…

  • Rich April 15, 2012, 7:32 am

    Still holding SPY Apr 137 puts since Thor’sday.

    Big4 Short Bonds, Gold, INDU, Long Bonds, S&P400, SPX, NDX and USD.

    Fasten seat belts for a flash crash?…

  • Robert April 14, 2012, 12:52 am

    Options…. {shudder}

    I have never been successful in the Call market. I have successfully short-sold out of the money Puts a few times when the underlying issue was a share that I was willing to own at lower prices in the event that the option was exercised…

  • Rick Ackerman April 13, 2012, 6:16 pm

    Thanks for sharing your results, Mark. Rick’s Picks neither tallies nor promotes P&L figures, since subscribers’ results only rarely match the hype of the gurus they follow.

    Our trades in GDXJ were consistent with Rick’s Picks’ practice of risking only very small sums when bottom-fishing in attractive stocks that are still falling. If you followed my forecasts and recommendations for GDXJ, you’ll know that before we even started to nibble, we side-stepped a steep fall from above $30 a share.

    It wasn’t until GDXJ fell to $23.93, a Hidden Pivot target, that we first bought stock. This proved timely, since GDXJ rallied from a low of 23.90 – three cents from our downside target — to 25.88. This allowed us to take partial profits that effectively reduced our cost basis, and to use a stop-loss that in theory made it impossible to lose if GDXJ plummeted anew. The stop did get hit and we exited with a profit, but we also prepared to buy aggressively at the next Hidden Pivot correction target, 22.74. This we did, using both stock and options. Although we subsequently exited the stock on a stop-loss, we still hold the options — August 23 calls bought for 1.85 — with a cost basis that was reduced to 1.45 by partial profit taking on Thursday’s rally.

    Generally speaking, all options trades recommend in Rick’s Picks come with strict risk management that entails taking a partial profit early in the trade. Also, when we buy options with more than a month left in them, it is usually with the goal of selling options of an earlier maturity against them. This enables us to capture the sometimes fat premiums in soon-to-expire puts and calls. Another tactic we often use is to buy puts or calls and turn them into vertical spreads by selling options of a higher or lower strike when the trade goes our way. Typically, we look to leg into these “vertical” spreads so that the worst we can do is break even. An example of this is the trade we have on in Silver Wheaton, where we legged into the June 40-42 call spread for no cost. This required buying June 40 calls when the stock bottomed at a Hidden Pivot correction target; then, when SLW rallied sharply not long thereafter, shorting June 42 calls for the same amount.

    How successful have these strategies been? Although I make no claims myself, I invite new subscribers, including those who have come aboard via the 7-day free trial linked on the home page, to inquire about results in the chat room.

    • Mark Uzick April 15, 2012, 4:58 pm

      Rick: Typically, we look to leg into these “vertical” spreads so that the worst we can do is break even. An example of this is the trade we have on in Silver Wheaton, where we legged into the June 40-42 call spread for no cost.

      Essentially, this amounts to taking the profits that you earn using the hidden pivot method and then plunking them down on a trade that is unguided by your method on the rationalization that this money is “free”. It’s not really free; you took risks involving some losses and invested time and effort to make this gross profit, so it’s not something to be regarded with any less seriousness than money from your paycheck or retirement account.

      If you believe that your method is superior to simply plunking money down to gamble on a position, then why wouldn’t you treat your profit with the same respect as the initial money you used to earn it? Spreads can serve a purpose, but shouldn’t that money’s use for entering spreads be guided by the same method you used to earn it as well as whether options pricing cause spreads to be a better value than straight options?

  • Mark Uzick April 13, 2012, 4:01 pm

    Here’s my experience at using Rick’s recommendations for GDXJ:
    1st time: I got a bit of a late start and used different strikes and expirations and I got out a bit late. (Yeah, I’m bad at following orders.) I netted $300 minus commissions.

    2nd time: I got in but was stopped out for a $100 loss plus commissions.

    3rd time: I got in a little late paying 1.80. My broker doesn’t yet allow me to have a simultaneous stop order and sell order (They say this will soon be remedied.) so I missed selling half for 2.25 but that’s OK – I got 2.30, bringing my effective cost to 1.30 plus commissions each. (My broker’s commissions are pretty low: 5.00 per trade plus 0.15/contract.)

  • mario cavolo April 13, 2012, 12:20 pm

    Hi Rick, thanks for the options wisdom. The only times I ever made money doing it the sucker’s retail way buying puts and calls was on short, fast intraday moves with deep in the money high delta options. The vast majority of times I’ved traded longer term time frames the options wasted away over time as the market jerked up and down just like you’re saying…

    Cheers, Mario