Rick Ackerman

Bears couldn't finish the job last week, stranding a fine-looking Hidden Pivot target at 1749.80 with a feeble rally to end the week. The target will remain valid nonetheless until such time as 1878.90 is exceeded to the upside. If and when that happens we shouldn't get too excited, since bulls too have been unable to achieve 'D' targets associated with similarly reliable patterns. For trading purposes I'll suggest backing up the truck to buy 'em if the futures get within 40 cents of 1749.80. A stop-loss as tight as 1747.90 can be used if the order is filled. _______ UPDATE (Feb 22, 4:37 p.m. EST): The futures went the 'wrong' way, getting nowhere near our bid. However, despite the seeming strength of the rally, it conspicuously failed to surpass  an 1814.20 'external' peak made on the way down last Tuesday. The peak seems likely to be exceeded soon, but the inability of bulls to accomplish this on the first try suggests that the coming rally is not destined for greatness. _______ UPDATE (Feb 24, 7:33 p.m.): No sooner was the 1814.20 peak exceeded than gold receded back into its wonted state of fake mournfulness.  The 1749.80 downside target is still in play theoretically, but I'm not encouraging anyone to give it much thought.

Silver spent a second consecutive week confounding bulls and bears alike, apparently in no hurry to resolve the bullish pattern shown. It nearly got negated by a phony swoon last Thursday evening, but the selling stopped just shy of the pattern's point 'C' low at 25.93. The shortfall will task bears when the new week begins, since the spike rebound generated a modest impulse leg on the hourly chart. The midpoint pivot at 28.66 can serve for now as a minimum upside objective, but it'll take a two-day close above it to imply that a finishing stroke to D=31.39 is likely. _______ UPDATE (Feb 24, 7:03 p.m. EST): Price action has been quite tedious, albeit within the context of a bullish channel in a bull market. Strip out the gratuitous Reddit/Robinhoodie spasm from three weeks ago and it grows even more tedious. The pattern projects to 31.39, as noted above, but the target won't be a "go" until such time as p=28.66 has been decisively exceeded.  Note: "Reading" price action at the midpoint Hidden Pivot is a key feature of my system. We can trade in and out of silver all day long, lowering the cost basis over time, but I'd prefer to do it with HP tactics that lower the entry risk to perhaps $150-$200 per contract rather than the $1000 that's possible when SI swings $2, as it has already done once in the C-D leg begun on 2/4.

[Dear readers, I am taking a desperately needed break from telling you why a stock market crash is long overdue, and why Biden & Friends are finally going to make it happen.  Full disclosure: I have not read a newspaper or watched the news since November. RA ] We’ve all grown so weary of spam callers pushing auto warranty coverage that voters would probably support the death penalty for the slimebags responsible for these calls. The recorded voice says “This is your final notice. The factory warranty on your vehicle is about to expire,” or some such. I get about ten of these calls a week, and although they used to spoof Colorado phone numbers because I lived there for 20 years, lately the calls have been coming from all over the U.S. How We All Pay Do we dare take encouragement from reports that Sen. Charles Schumer has been receiving these calls like the rest of us, and that he is so pissed off that he has vowed to do something about it?  "Not only are these calls a nuisance," he told the New York Times, "they also tie up land lines and can eat up a user’s cell phone minutes, possibly leading to a higher cell phone bill due to overage charges.” Schumer, arguably the most powerful member of the U.S. Senate, has called for a federal investigation into “robo-dialer harassment.” He’s even gotten headlines with a call to war: Schumer Urges Inquiry of Companies Behind Bogus Auto Warranty Calls announced the Times. Sounds promising, right? Wrong. The headline is actually from 2009 (!!), and you can judge for yourself how much progress the Senate majority leader and his colleagues have made ridding us of the auto warranty plague. Sadly, a Google search would seem to suggest that

The so-far high of this bull market has fallen just shy of a 234.82 target with a sterling pedigree. All three coordinate used to calculate the target are historical, with a point 'A' low located at 2009's watershed low, and a B-C correction that brackets the market's epic collapse a year ago.  I'll recommend waiting for Mr. Market to hand us the trade we want on a silver platter before we jump aggressively on some March 19 190/185 puts spreads. I'd originally suggested a 0.15 bid but am now advising that you buy them at will, stepping up your size at lower and lower prices as IWM gets closer to the target. Going up against a bull that is about to enter its 13th year is of course highly speculative, so don't risk any more than you could afford to lose without pain or remorse. The pattern is very clear an compelling, with three 'locked' coordinates for which there are no alternatives. That is why I strongly doubt IWM will blow past the target, at least initially. There is almost certain to be a tradeable pullback from very close to 234.82, and that is what we are betting on, not the ever elusive Mother of All Tops. As always, once you've bought any puts spreads, offer half of them to close for twice what you paid. _______ UPDATE (Feb 18, 9:30 p.m.): Bears have fought so hard for meager yardage over the last few days that they look ready to keel over dead. Absent some sort of Sunday night shock, we might look for the broad averages to reverse and pop to new record highs next week. If so, we should keep that 234.82 target in mind as a place to get short aggressively.

In retrospect, it was entirely predictable that Mr. Market would push this little scumsucker to within a split hair of my longstanding target at 3938.25 on a Friday afternoon, just ahead of a three-day weekend. The actual high was 3936.25, a shortfall of five hundredths of a percentage point. So what now?  If you took a small short position as originally advised, don't worry, you're going to be just fine. But we will still have to sit and wait until Tuesday (!!) until options start trading again, and anything could happen between then and Sunday night, when index futures will open for a limited number of hours. All we can do is cross our fingers and hope stocks are still hovering near my targets have when the new, holiday-shortened week begins. That could provide the opportunity we've waited so patiently for to buy way-out-of-the-money put spreads in, for one, IWM, but also possibly DIA and QQQ. _______ UPDATE (Feb 15, 11:51 a.m. EST): At the moment, the futures are doing what in a normal world, in a bull market not driven by full-blown psychosis, would seem absolutely impossible -- i.e., pushing above 3938.25 as though this solid-titanium Hidden Pivot did not exist. If the 234.82 rally target in IWM suffers the same fate, it will bring me closer to the conclusion that nothing short of a true black swan -- i.e., an event that is unforeseeable and well nigh unimaginable -- can stop an asset bubble fed by practically unlimited credit easing around the world. That said, I doubt the current push through 3938.25 will get very far. Price movement in markets disrupted by three-day holidays are always greedily opportunistic of thin supply/demand, so it doesn't surprise me that the criminals who control these markets are using President's Day to

The pattern shown is as gnarly-perfect as they come, and so we should expect the 318.30 target drum-rolled here earlier to work with astounding precision. That implies that the so-far high at 315.76 will need to be improved on before we can consider the rally spent. Even if I am off by a few pennies, I strongly doubt DIA will exceed 318.30 by much before taking the plunge that is so grotesquely overdue. My advice remains unchanged in any event: Buy puts that expire in around two weeks for less than 0.50 when DIA gets within 0.15 of the target. I will be keeping close track and may need to adjust this guidance if index futures spike Sunday evening, so stay tuned. ______ UPDATE (Feb 18, 9:13 a.m.): Tuesday's pre-opening high at 317.60 missed the target by 70 cents, or less than a point. Although this is not quite 'astounding precision', it's close enough for us to consider the target fulfilled. Now let's see how far the reversal goes.

Tracking three sets of targets for two vehicles -- QQQ and the E-Mini Nasdaq -- in one tout became unwieldly and confusing, so I am limiting this analysis for simplicity's sake. The 337.10 rally target shown corresponds very closely to targets in ES and DIA that were missed last week by millimeters. A hat-trick of major tops is possible, and I've suggested getting short speculatively via puts in DIA and/or IWM. You're on your own if you elect to trade the E-Mini Nasdaq, but as far as I can tell there are only a handful of subscribers with the experience and brass balls needed to get in its way. My target for it, flagged here earlier, is 13836. The actual high last week was 13821. _______ UPDATE (Feb 16, 8:00 p.m.): Both QQQ and the E-Mini Nasdaq (NQ) reversed after slightly exceeding their respectively rally targets. If you got short at either, stop yourself out on a close above the highs. ______ UPDATE (Feb 17, 8:33 p.m.): After exceeding the 13836 rally target by 64 points, the futures have plunged, trading more than 300 points below it. If you got short and hung on, as much as half of the position should have been covered by now.

Gold remains easily tradeable not only on the intraday charts, but on the 'daily' as well. A routine 'mechanical' short sketched out here last week produced a quick profit of $3100 per contract, even if the set-up was uninspiring. Traders should have no illusions, however, that they will be catching the start of a major move. since the long, tedious slog lower since last August offers no hint of a significant turn. The correction at the December low amounted to just 16% off the 2107 high recorded in August, not even qualifying as a bear market. Nor has the correction produced a bearish impulse leg on the daily chart; that would take a breach of the 1704 low recorded last June. Wake me if this happens, or if a powerful stab higher takes out November's 1978 high -- an event that would be bullishly impulsive and suggest gold might be on its way to as high as 2284. _______ UPDATE (Feb 16, 10:03 a.m. EST): The futures are getting pounded today for no good reason, presumably bound for the  1765.50 target shown. They typically do not reach D targets in either direction, but in this case the precipitous move through p  suggests selling will go the distance. Here's the chart. _____ UPDATE (Feb 17, 8:37 p.m.): A so far feeble bounce has occurred from within 2.40 points of the 1765.50 target, but it would take a print at 1795.20 to lift bulls from immediate jeopardy. _______ UPDATE (Feb 18, 9:43 p.m.):  Gold got barely any bounce from the 1765.50 target. This means it is about to fall to 1749.80, where you should look for a tradeable bounce. Here's the chart.

March Silver remains on track to achieve the 34.67 target shown. The chart looks more bullish than gold's, but we needn't overly concern ourselves with this, since eventually they will get back in line. My gut feeling is that silver will turn less bullish to accomplish this rather than gold turning more bullish. That's because the spike to $30 a few weeks ago brought on by youthful blusterers at Reddit quickly aborted when they ran out of juice and into reality. Even so, if the detumescence should continue down to the green line (25.11), the 'mechanical' buy I suggested there earlier would still be in force. The stop-loss would be at 21.92, just beneath the pattern's point 'C' low, but we'd be shooting for just a one-level ride to p=28.30, rather than a rocket ride all the way to D=34.67. ______ UPDATE (Feb 18, 9:48 p.m. EST): Silver has turned 'less bullish' (see above), but it still looks better than gold. I've projected at least somewhat lower prices for the latter, but let's see if the futures can hold above 25.935 top keep the short-term-bullish pattern projecting to 31.39 alive.